But of course it's not just software.
Oh, I haven't personally experienced libraries refusing to share information. In fact when I was researching our "Library on Location" project, everyone I contacted was more than happy to give me stories, photos, even survey data. But... I did have to track them down from oblique references in old blogs and newsletters and email them, one by one.
And we put our own Library on Location reports online, which I'm glad we could do. But... we had to ask if we could do it, and only our conference paper is in any kind of official repository sort of space.
Is this consistent with our profession's attempts to convince academics to put their research papers and data into institutional repositories?
And is it an efficient, librarian-like way of organising the accumulated knowledge within the profession?
Projects that work.
Projects that don't work.
Projects that might work but we ran out of funding.
Projects that would work if we could share the workload with another institution.
This might have been why the Library Success wiki was created. It's a great idea, but its contributors are individuals, not libraries, so it just doesn't have the kind of oomph I'm thinking about.
What if every library in the world brought their anonymised circulation data, their IM reference statistics, their anonymised usability testing and survey results, their project reports, their lesson plans and handouts, and their iPhone applications out from their hard drives and their intranets and made them publically accessible?
What if they all licensed this stuff (and photos and podcasts and vidcasts and...) with a Creative Commons or GPL license?
What if they all created a single website where this stuff could be stored and searched in one place?
What if that website allowed space for libraries and librarians to comment and collaborate on and add to each other's work?
No, seriously, I mean it
At the end of the month my library's delegates to LIANZA2008 are going to report back to the rest of the staff about what we got out of the conference. I got 4 things out of conference, 3 of which were:
- Leadership - future taking vs future making
- Innovation - just do it
- Why are they presenting on this topic when we've gone further in our analogous project and have more experience of how it works in practice? Oh yes: because it never occurred to us to share.
What about the rest of the world?